The facts about Carolina Gold rice and Champneys Pink Cluster rose are sparse. However, because each was important, others have created narratives that fit their beliefs. Not surprisingly those mythic explanations have changed with circumstances to fit our changing expectations for appropriate heroes.
Originally, people gave credit to John Champneys for the hybrid pink rose, but today people prefer Philippe Noisette, not because of Champneys’ tory leanings, which are largely unknown, but because Noisette married a mulatto in Haiti and lived openly with her and their six children in Charleston.
Earlier, people accepted the view that Hezekiah Maham’s rice, and that of early South Carolina, came from Madagascar. More recently, some scholars, especially Judith Carney, have taken the facts that the early methods for milling and winnowing rice came from Africa and that many of the slaves imported in the years when Henry Laurens was active in the trade came from the rice growing regions of west Africa, to suggest that not only was seed rice imported from Africa, but the entire agricultural tool kit, including irrigation methods, was introduced by Blacks in exchange for adoption of an easier task system of labor.
Few gardeners or farmers care about the origins of their plants, except as amusing trivia. However, the facts and the way they are interpreted can be important social indicators. The differences and similarities in the way two disparate plants are treated may go farther to reveal underlying cultural patterns.
The only facts we tend to accept today come from genetics. Recently, biologists at Florida Southern College have confirmed that all the DNA found in fragment bands in Champneys Pink Cluster is found in Parson’s Pink and existing musk roses. They also confirmed that only half the DNA found in Blush Noisette is shared with Champneys Pink Cluster, and the rest is from some unknown source. They made no attempt to determine which was the pollen and which the seed parent for Champneys’ rose.
Genetic interpretations of the origin of rice are more controversial, because cultural honor is involved. Ya-Long Guo and Song Ge believe the rice genus, Oryza, diverged within the grass family about 15 million years ago during the Miocene and the African varieties separated from the Asian about 7 million years ago.
The closest relative of modern rice, Oryza sativa, is O. rufipogon, itself dervied from O. nivara, while the nearest species to domesticated African rice, O. glaberrima is O. barthii. Nivara and barthii share a common ancestor. All are all considered be part of the same AA genome, distinct from five other groups of modern rice.
The Asian rice divided into two subspecies, wetland japonica and dryland indica, as a result of domestication and the subsequent movement of rice eaters into new habitats. Some, looking at the genetics, argue the one is derived from the other; others, looking at the archaeological record, believe they resulted from separate events that occurred south of the Himalayas, one in India, Myanmar or Thailand, the other in southern China or Vietnam.
As rice moved from China through Korea to Japan and the Philippines, then southeast to Sulawesi, Borneo, Java, and Sumatra, another, more tropical, subspecies emerged, javanica, which was the one taken to Madagascar. Linguists have determined current Malagasy is closest to the Maanyan language of Borneo, while geneticists have found the DNA of modern residents owes its Asian component to Borneo.
Medieval trade with Arabs on Kilwa island, who had contact through Aden with Gujuart, may have first introduced dryland rice from India. As trade and contacts across the Indian Ocean expanded after Europeans appeared, more ways were opened for rice imports.
In 1986, Koji Tanaka discovered javanica is still grown on the southeast coast of Madagascar where it’s extracted by foot and milled with a mortar and pestle. In the uplands and west, indica dominates and animals are used to separate the rice, while the northeast grows javanica and uses animal labor.
Notes: Javanica is now treated as a subspecies of japonica.
Burney, David. "Finding the Connections between Paleoecology, Ethnobotany and Conservation in Madagascar," Ethnobotany Research and Applications 3:385-389:2005.
Carney, Judith. Black Rice: The African Origins of Rice Cultivation in the Americas, 2001.
Garlake, Peter. The Kingdoms of Africa, 1978.
Guo, Ya-Long and Song Ge. "Molecular Phylogeny of Oryzeae (Poaceae) Based on DNA Sequences from Chloroplast, Mitochondrial, and Nuclear Genomes," American Journal of Botany 92:1548-1558:2005.
Hurles, Matthew E., Bryan C. Sykes, Mark A. Jobling, and Peter Forster. "The Dual Origin of the Malagasy in Island Southeast Asia and East Africa: Evidence from Maternal and Paternal Lineages," The American Journal of Human Genetics 76:894–901:2005.
Joshi, S. P., V. S. Gupta, R. K. Aggarwal, P. K. Ranjekar, and D. S. Brar. "Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationship as Revealed by Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) Polymorphism in the Genus Oryza," Theoretical and Applied Genetics 100:1311-1320:2000.
Tanaka, Koji. "Rice and Rice Culture in Madagascar," Tonan Ajia Kenkyu 26:367-393:1989.
_____ "Malayan Cultivated Rice and Its Expansion - Part Three," Agricultural Archaeology 97-107:1997.
No comments:
Post a Comment