Showing posts with label 01 Atencio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 01 Atencio. Show all posts
Sunday, October 07, 2018
Atencio Land
The owner of the Arrow Motel was the estate of Mela Atencio. [1] José de Atienza Alcalá y Escobar along with his sons Juan de Atienza and José de Atienza Sevillano were recruited by Francisco Farfán in Mexico City in 1693 to move north with the Reconquest. [2] Juan was a weaver. [3]
Farfán’s group was assigned land along the Santa Cruz river by Diego de Vargas. At some time, descendants affiliated with Capilla de Santo Niño, [4] and claimed the last arable land to the west. Beyond, their holdings, the land dropped several feet to the flood plain of the Río Grande that was part of the Santa Clara grant.
Donna Roy said the family restaurant originally was located in a stable tack room. [5] The associated residence may have been the territorial farmhouse that stood between the old Long John Silver building and El Paragua.
After the house was torn down in 2015, its lot has been used for parking by the restaurant.
The border land became valuable after the road from Santa Fé to Taos was upgraded. The construction would have involved creating a grade from the bottom lands to drier uplands gentle enough for trucks of the period. The extension to the Arrow Motel was built along that grade.
On the other side of the road, the developers of the 78 Plaza Shopping Center built a retaining wall and filled the area from it to the Chimayó road to create a level lot. The picture below shows the land sloping both to the south and the west. The truck bed gives an idea of the high of the drop; the buttresses may have been added when the weight of the building put too much pressure on the soft foundation land.
I suspect the land just north of the Arrow Motel that was used by Larry’s Auto Sales once was part of the family holdings. Wild pink roses grew in front of the used car dealership and the motel. I’ve found the continuity of plants often signifies older land ownership patterns.
Larry Martinez’ land was level and graveled, with only a small office building. Such barrenness on a busy road usually means something has been torn down. By the front sidewalk he had a cemetery grave enclosure. I assume he either made them himself or represented the welder-craftsman who did. His business disappeared 2017 during the time the city was negotiating with Atencio’s estate to have the fire damaged laudromat building removed.
Photographs
1. Territorial farm house from south side facing road to Chimayó, 30 March 2014.
2. Territorial farm house from north side facing back of Long John Silver, 30 March 2014.
3. Wall seen in # 1, 19 August 2018.
4. Arrow Motel addition, 30 March 2014.
5. 76 Plaza retaining wall, 4 August 2018.
6. Cemetery grave enclosure, Larry’s Auto’s, 28 February 2016.
Notes
The Arrow Motel was discussed in the post for 3 October 2018. The fire damaged Speedway Laundromat was featured in the most for 30 September 2018.
1. Santa Fe County Assessor’s Office. Attachment to City of Espanola Resolution No. 2017-18.
2. Farfán, Francisco. "List of New Mexico Colonists, Mexico City," on or before July 1693. 245. In John L. Kessell, John L.Rick Hendricks, and Meredith Dodge. To the Royal Crown Restored: The Journals of Don Diego de Vargas, New Mexico, 1693-1694, 1995.
3. Kessell. 320.
4. Donna Roy. "In Española, a Restaurant and a Tradition Are Reborn." The Santa Fe New Mexican. 26 July 1992. 9.
5. Roy
Sunday, November 08, 2015
Santa Cruz Leaders
The population in the Santa Cruz valley was more diverse than the one in Chimayó. Marriages hadn’t yet bridged cultural differences between La Cañada, the Río Abajo, Ciudad de México, and the mining towns, but men were cooperating to create a more unified society.
Witness lists from the diligencias matrimoniales indicate that more than two-thirds of the weddings between 1714 and 1730 were approved by men from both La Cañada and elsewhere, even when the bride and groom were from the same group.
More important, a pool of men was called year after year. That could mean the friars were more comfortable with some men than others. However, with frequent ecclesiastical turnovers, the reappearance of some men more likely suggests they were the agreed upon community leaders.
The group represented the entire male population, with more in their twenties and thirties when they first appeared. However, while men in their thirties were most often to be called, the ones called for five or more years were likely to come from families in Nuevo México before the Revolt: José de Madrid, Antonio Bernal and Tomás Núñez de Haro were each called in seven years.
Madrid was the son of Roque and his first wife, Juana de Arvid López. Neither Bernal’s parents nor those of his wife, Rosa María Romero de Prazda, are known. Francisco Romero de Prazda was tentiente alcade at Santa Domingo in 1664. He had a dependent named María living with him in 1693 at El Paso.
Núñez was born in Zacatecas, but apparently moved north before the Revolt, perhaps when Diego de Peñalosa was governor in the 1660s. He married Juana Durán, whose father Nicolás was an aide to Peñalosa. Her paternal grandmother was Catalina Bernal. His current wife was the niece of Juana, another Juana Durán. This was the daughter of the first Juana’s brother, Salvador Durán, and Ana Márquez.
Núñez was the only one known to be close to the Franciscans. He supported them in 1730 when the Bishop of Durango was making inquiries, and was a member of the Conquistadora Confraternity.
The man who testified for six years, Sebastían Durán, was the son of Fernando Durán y Chaves and Elena Ruiz Cáceres. His family was originally from the Río Abajo, but they were living in Taos in 1680. Elena was descended from Juan Ruiz Cáceres whose daughter married the father of Roque de Madrid. Roque himself married Salvador’s daughter, Josefa Durán, in 1715, when he had been a widower for more than a year. They had been accused of adultery in 1700.
Domingo Martín was the oldest of the frequently called witnesses. His father Domingo was apparently the oldest son of Luis Martín Serrano. When Luis’s property was divided, his son Domingo may have received the best share, or bought out his brothers Antonio and Francisco who moved to Chimayó.
The other two men called for five years were new colonists. Roque Jaramillo was eleven-years-old when his brick-mason father decided to leave Mexico City. José de Atienza Sevillano also came from an urban, skilled-trades family: his father made paving stones, his brother Juan was a weaver.
Most of the remaining men who were called in two, three or four years were equally from La Cañada, Mexico City or the mining towns. The exception were the soldiers who were present between 1715 and 1719, and again in the late 1720s.
Notes: First appearance means within this time period; the older men no doubt began being called when they were younger.
Roque’s brother Lorenzo was accused of illicit relations with Juana Domínguez in 1697. They later married. Salvador’s daughter, Josefa Durán, used the name Luján when she was married to Augustín Griego. Both accusations of infidelity occurred when Diego de Vargas was under attack by Pedro Cubero. Lorenzo’s name appears as maestro de campo in Santa Fé.
For more on the Bishop of Durango, see the post for 28 June 2015.
Chávez, Angélico. New Mexico Roots, Ltd, 1982.
_____. Origins of New Mexico Families, 1992 revised edition.
Kessell, John L., Rick Hendricks, and Meredith Dodge. To the Royal Crown Restored, 1995.
Witness lists from the diligencias matrimoniales indicate that more than two-thirds of the weddings between 1714 and 1730 were approved by men from both La Cañada and elsewhere, even when the bride and groom were from the same group.
| Year | Both Local | Man Local | Woman Local | Both Not Local | Total |
| 1714 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | |
| 1715 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 1716 | 3 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 1717 | 2 | 2 | |||
| 1718 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 | |
| 1719 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | |
| 1720 | 1 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1721 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1722 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 1723 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1724 | |||||
| 1725 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 1726 | 3 | 3 | |||
| 1727 | 2 | 5 | 7 | ||
| 1728 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 1729 | |||||
| 1730 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1731 | |||||
| 1732 | |||||
| 9 | 9 | 12 | 26 | 56 |
More important, a pool of men was called year after year. That could mean the friars were more comfortable with some men than others. However, with frequent ecclesiastical turnovers, the reappearance of some men more likely suggests they were the agreed upon community leaders.
The group represented the entire male population, with more in their twenties and thirties when they first appeared. However, while men in their thirties were most often to be called, the ones called for five or more years were likely to come from families in Nuevo México before the Revolt: José de Madrid, Antonio Bernal and Tomás Núñez de Haro were each called in seven years.
| Age | 5+ | 2-4 |
| 20s | 9 | |
| 30s | 4 | 9 |
| 40s | 1 | 6 |
| 50s | 2 | 5 |
| 60s | 1 | |
| 70s | 1 | |
| Number of Years Called to Witness by Age When First Called | ||
Madrid was the son of Roque and his first wife, Juana de Arvid López. Neither Bernal’s parents nor those of his wife, Rosa María Romero de Prazda, are known. Francisco Romero de Prazda was tentiente alcade at Santa Domingo in 1664. He had a dependent named María living with him in 1693 at El Paso.
Núñez was born in Zacatecas, but apparently moved north before the Revolt, perhaps when Diego de Peñalosa was governor in the 1660s. He married Juana Durán, whose father Nicolás was an aide to Peñalosa. Her paternal grandmother was Catalina Bernal. His current wife was the niece of Juana, another Juana Durán. This was the daughter of the first Juana’s brother, Salvador Durán, and Ana Márquez.
Núñez was the only one known to be close to the Franciscans. He supported them in 1730 when the Bishop of Durango was making inquiries, and was a member of the Conquistadora Confraternity.
The man who testified for six years, Sebastían Durán, was the son of Fernando Durán y Chaves and Elena Ruiz Cáceres. His family was originally from the Río Abajo, but they were living in Taos in 1680. Elena was descended from Juan Ruiz Cáceres whose daughter married the father of Roque de Madrid. Roque himself married Salvador’s daughter, Josefa Durán, in 1715, when he had been a widower for more than a year. They had been accused of adultery in 1700.
Domingo Martín was the oldest of the frequently called witnesses. His father Domingo was apparently the oldest son of Luis Martín Serrano. When Luis’s property was divided, his son Domingo may have received the best share, or bought out his brothers Antonio and Francisco who moved to Chimayó.
The other two men called for five years were new colonists. Roque Jaramillo was eleven-years-old when his brick-mason father decided to leave Mexico City. José de Atienza Sevillano also came from an urban, skilled-trades family: his father made paving stones, his brother Juan was a weaver.
Most of the remaining men who were called in two, three or four years were equally from La Cañada, Mexico City or the mining towns. The exception were the soldiers who were present between 1715 and 1719, and again in the late 1720s.
| First Appearance | ||||
| Years | Name | From | Year | Age |
| 7 | Antonio Bernal | Local | 1718 | 30 |
| 7 | José de Madrid | Local | 1718 | 40 |
| 7 | Tomás Núñez de Haro | Zacatecas | 1714 | 52 |
| 6 | Sebastían Durán | Local | 1714 | 38 |
| 5 | Domingo Martín | Local | 1714 | 56 |
| 5 | Joque Jaramillo | Mexico City | 1720 | 35 |
| 5 | José de Atienza | Mexico City | 1714 | 36 |
| 4 | Juan Alonso Mondragón | Local | 1718 | 40 |
| 4 | Lucas Flores | Parras | 1714 | 50 |
| 3 | Francisco Xavier Romero | Mexico City | 1714 | 56 |
| 3 | Juan Alonso | Local | 1719 | 38 |
| 3 | Juan de Atienza | Puebla | 1714 | 46 |
| 3 | Juan Martín | Local | 1717 | 23 |
| 3 | Mateo Trujillo | Soldier | 1723 | 48 |
| 3 | Pedro Sánchez | Río Abajo | 1725 | 22 |
| 2 | Antonio de Herrera | Salvatierra | 1714 | 30 |
| 2 | Cayatano de Atienza | Mexico City | 1725 | 34 |
| 2 | Cristóbal Tafoya | Tlalpujahua | 1720 | 40 |
| 2 | Diego Martín | Local | 1716 | 45 |
| 2 | Domingo Montes Vigil | Zacatecas | 1719 | 25 |
| 2 | Francisco Alberto de la Mora | Zamora | 1716 | 56 |
| 2 | Isidro de Medina | Durango | 1720 | 28 |
| 2 | Juan de Sandoval Martínez | Mexico City | 1722 | 63 |
| 2 | Lázaro de Córdova | Mexico City | 1714 | 24 |
| 2 | Luís de Archuleta | Local | 1720 | 20 |
| 2 | Roque de Madrid | Local | 1716 | 70 |
| 2 | Miguel Martín | Local | 1714 | 30 |
| 2 | Nicolás Sisneros | Local | 1714 | 24 |
| 2 | Ramon Medina | Soldier | 1719 | 28 |
| 2 | Santiago Romero | Mexico City | 1719 | 26 |
| 2 | Ventura Esquibel | Soldier | 1718 | 33 |
| Santa Cruz Witnesses for Diligencias Matrimoniales between 1714 and 1730 | ||||
Notes: First appearance means within this time period; the older men no doubt began being called when they were younger.
Roque’s brother Lorenzo was accused of illicit relations with Juana Domínguez in 1697. They later married. Salvador’s daughter, Josefa Durán, used the name Luján when she was married to Augustín Griego. Both accusations of infidelity occurred when Diego de Vargas was under attack by Pedro Cubero. Lorenzo’s name appears as maestro de campo in Santa Fé.
For more on the Bishop of Durango, see the post for 28 June 2015.
Chávez, Angélico. New Mexico Roots, Ltd, 1982.
_____. Origins of New Mexico Families, 1992 revised edition.
Kessell, John L., Rick Hendricks, and Meredith Dodge. To the Royal Crown Restored, 1995.
Labels:
01 Atencio,
01 Jaramillo,
01 Núñez,
08 Santa Cruz 26-30
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)